A Ministry of the School of Theology and Christian Ministry—Olivet Nazarene University

Biblically Speaking

Biblically Speaking offers articles related to the field of Biblical Studies. In this issue, Eddie Ellis reviews Tripp York’s The Devil Wears Nada, a book exploring the concept of Satan in Bible, religion, and culture.

Featured Article

Tripp York’s The Devil Wears Nada

Book Review: York, Tripp. The Devil Wears Nada: Satan Exposed. Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books, 2011.

“Nobody likes a smart-aleck, Son.” I can’t count the number of times my father said that to me (for good reason, I admit) when I was growing up. Dad’s adage rang repeatedly in my ears as I read Tripp York’s The Devil Wears Nada. 

York’s introduction begins in the middle of the action (or, as some students of literature might prefer, in medias res), as he recounts a portion of one of the many interviews he conducted in preparation for writing the book. In that very brief excerpt, York recalls telling a preacher “whose sideburns suggested a slight obsession with the King of Rock & Roll” (p. 3) that he wanted to find Satan in order to find God. Having set the stage for the quest that the rest of the book will chronicle, York spends a few pages reflecting on the experiences that led him to begin his rather unorthodox search. Those who search for God, he says, tend to operate “in one of two frameworks: personal experience or apologetic precision” (p. 4). York finds both frameworks sorely insufficient. Personal experience, he argues, is too subjective to be of value to anyone but the individual to whom it belongs. Further, reliance on such experience tends to lead us to define God in the way that we find most pleasing, essentially creating our own god “in our image” (p.5). Even weaker than personal experience, for York, is the apologist’s effort to prove the existence of God through philosophical arguments. Such arguments, he says, tend to say nothing about the character of the god whose existence they have proven. Further, they “have the uncanny tendency to convince only those who need no convincing” (p. 6). Years of teaching have left York weary of his students’ predictable, weak, uninteresting arguments.

0 Comments Read More
 

Recent Articles

The Trouble with Translations


Translations of the Bible are dangerous. I’m not the first to say that, of course. During the Middle Ages, many leaders in the established Western church felt threatened by anything that gave lay people direct access to holy writ. Well, I don’t feel threatened by translations; in fact, I thank God that lay people (and professionals like me) have the opportunity to read the Scripture in their own languages. I confess that, even though I love studying Greek, I sometimes prefer to read the Scripture in English. My quarrel with translations isn’t about the access to Scripture they create for the lay reader; it isn’t about what they reveal. It’s about what they hide: ambiguity. Translation necessarily involves interpretation. That is, translators often find that the text they are translating can mean more than one thing, and, in order to translate it, they have to decide which of the possible meanings they think is the correct one. Often, what is ambiguous

0 Comments Read More
 

N. T. Wright 101

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Those of us who are a part of the Wesleyan theological tradition are not unfamiliar with the work of prolific Anglican ministers.  Of course I'm thinking of John Wesley himself, but also of a scholar whose work has garnered much interest in recent years: Nicholas Thomas Wright.  I wouldn't be surprised if his name has come up in your conversations with peers in the ministry, or if you've happened to pick up one of his many published works.  Some have described him as this generation's C. S. Lewis; others have dismissed him as just one more out-of-touch, liberal biblical scholar.  But who is N. T. Wright?  What do those of us who minister within the context of the Wesleyan tradition need to know about him?  As I have spent some significant time in my graduate studies here at Olivet mulling over the work of N. T. Wright, I have been asked to offer some answers.  I'll try and shed some light on Wright by examining some of his recent work.  So here we go: a little N. T. Wright 101 . . . .

First, a little background information.  One of the foremost things that I appreciate about Wright is that he is both a well-educated scholar and a dedicated churchman.  Wright is a British New Testament scholar who has spent most of his 40-year academic career as a student and professor at both Oxford and Cambridge.  He has also served as the Church of England's Bishop of Durham from 2003-2010, after which he returned to the university.  He currently teaches at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland.  Wright's career demonstrates a clear commitment to both the university and the church.

0 Comments Read More
 

Hermeneutical Reflections on N. T. Wright’s Understanding of the Jewish Jesus: Luke 24:13-35 and the Two Travelers to Emmaus

Hermeneutical Reflections on N. T. Wright's Understanding of the Jewish Jesus:   Luke 24:13-35 and the Two Travelers to Emmaus

Do not put words in my mouth.  How many of us have found ourselves giving voice to this request?  How many of us have found ourselves in a position where what we have said has been misrepresented, intentionally or not?  To say the least, we do not appreciate such actions.

Each fall as students come back from their summer vacations, I have the opportunity to introduce them to biblical hermeneutics.  As indicated at the start of the course, hermeneutics is the science and art of interpretation.  Defined as such, all of us are involved in activities related to hermeneutics as we daily arise from bed, exit our homes, and try to make sense of the world around us.  Interpretation is a part of life.  Our class, however, is not just concerned with interpretation in general, but with the interpretation of documents which are foundational for our faith. 

0 Comments Read More